Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vic Edelbrock, Jr.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Paul August ☎ 05:16, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The current head of Edelbrock bike parts. I have no problem with an entry on the company but an extra entry on the person who is running the enterprise at the moment is vanity. Hey, he isn't Carly Fiorina. Pilatus 11:04, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, the above information is wrong. Vic Edelbrock, Jr. heads a company which primarily manufactures automotive parts. Vic is a little bit more than a man who is running the enterprise at the moment. He has been president of the company for over 40 years and is the son of the founder, Vic Edelbrock. I'm sorry more hasn't been written yet, but I thought I would start the article and be given a chance to write more before my article was speedy deleted. Also, there was a request for this article on the Smokey Yunick page. I corrected that article to read Vic Edelbrock, Jr. and created this article. Why put up a request for an ad and then delete it when it's created? MiracleMat 15:30, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keeep. Notable. mikka (t) 18:45, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but not as strongly as his father's article nominated above. Significant in the industry for decades, but not the pioneer that his father was. Barno 20:46, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Again no content. Split out again if biographic data in Edelbrock grows enough to warrant it. — Phil Welch 23:00, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep absolutely. A legend in the racing industry. -Carl Redmond
- EXPANDED slightly to indicate notability, still substubby. For historical references, see the Stock Car Racing magazine article that I cited in the AfD for Vic Senior's article. I don't have handy access to my physical copies of issues from those years, but they might be online or another editor such as the Richie Evans editors may have them. Barno 05:01, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.